Increasing obstetric intervention for fetal growth restriction is shifting birthweight centiles: a retrospective cohort study.

Bookmark(0)

To assess the impact of increasing obstetric intervention on birthweight centiles.Retrospective cohort study of births in five two-year epochs: 1983-84, 1993-94, 2003-04, 2013-14, and 2016-17.665,205 singleton births at ≥32 weeks’ gestation.All maternity services in Victoria, Australia.For each epoch, we calculated the birthweight cutoffs defining each birthweight centile at 34, 37 and 40 weeks’ gestation. We calculated rates of iatrogenic delivery over time. We then calculated the number of babies whose birthweight would have classified them as ≥3rd centile based on 1983-84 centile definitions but as <3rd centile based on 2016-17 centile definitions.birthweight centile, and gestation at delivery.From 1983-84 to 2016-17, the rate of iatrogenic delivery for singleton pregnancies increased at all term gestations: 1.6% to 6.4% at 37 weeks’, 4.5% to 18.3% at 38 weeks’, 7.6% to 23.9% at 39 weeks’, and 18.4% to 25.1% at 40 weeks’ (all P < 0.001). Over the same period, the birthweight cutoffs defining the 3rd , 5th and 10th centiles increased significantly at term, but not preterm, gestations. This led to increasing numbers of term births being classified as being SGA. Of the 2,748 babies born in 2016-17 at 37-39 weeks’ gestation with a birthweight <3rd centile in that period, 1,478 (53.8%) would have been classified as ≥3rd centile based on 1983-84 centile definitions.Increasing intervention is shifting the birthweight cutoffs that define birthweight centiles and thereby redefining what constitutes SGA. This undermines the use of population-derived birthweight centiles to audit clinical care.

Click here to read the full article @ BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology

Suggested articles